Remote Viewing – the extrasensory perception method developed originally for U.S. military intelligence – has been used for decades not only to observe terrestrial targets, but to investigate UAP (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena) and make contact with representatives of non-human intelligence. Unlike passively tracking objects on radar, Remote Viewing can reach information no technical device is capable of gathering: the nature, intentions, and consciousness of the beings behind those objects.
This is not speculation. It is an area in which I have conducted empirical research for over twenty years – as the only practicing researcher in Poland who has assembled and trained Remote Viewing groups focused exclusively on this field.
What Is Remote Viewing – and Why Does It Work Where Radar Fails?
Remote Viewing is an extrasensory perception protocol based on the principle of blind research. The observer – called the viewer – does not know the target in advance. They receive only a coded designation and through extrasensory perception read information about what that target represents.
Three properties of this method are essential for UAP research:
- Time and space are not barriers to perception.
- Lack of target knowledge eliminates suggestion effects and imagination projection.
- The method has been tested and applied under verifiable, not merely subjective, conditions.
Classical UFO research – based on visual observation, photography, and radar – tells us that something is there. Remote Viewing tells us what it is.
Was Remote Viewing Actually Used to Study UAP and Extraterrestrial Beings?
Yes – and this is not speculation.
After the official closure of the government Stargate program (conducted by SRI International and the DIA), many of its participants – freed from classification – began sharing their knowledge publicly. Some dedicated themselves to researching extraterrestrial phenomena using the developed protocols.
Courtney Brown, founder of the Farsight Institute, was among the first to publish results of Remote Viewing research focused on extraterrestrial civilizations – collected in the book Cosmic Voyage. Those results, however controversial, launched an entirely new branch of UAP research: one based not on instrumentation but on expanded perception.
| Research Aspect | Traditional UFO/UAP Methods | Remote Viewing |
|---|---|---|
| Observation tool | Radar, camera, naked eye | Viewer’s extrasensory perception |
| Access to object | Limited – external observation only | Unrestricted by time or space |
| Possibility of interaction | None | Yes – in advanced practice |
| Verifiability | Technically measurable | Protocol-based |
| Access to intentions and consciousness | No | Yes |
What Does a Remote Viewing Session Targeting UAP or NHI Look Like?
In practice, a Remote Viewing session targeting UAP or NHI (Non-Human Intelligence – the term now used by U.S. government institutions in place of “extraterrestrials”) proceeds according to the same protocols as any other session.
The viewer:
- Receives a coded target designation – with no additional information.
- Enters a state of focused attention in which extrasensory perception becomes active.
- Describes sensory impressions, shapes, structures, intentions, emotions – without interpreting.
- After the session concludes, a reveal occurs – the target is disclosed and compared with what the viewer described.
When the target is a UAP object or a non-human being, experienced viewers describe not only external appearance but something that can be characterized as a presence of consciousness – purposeful, non-random, and sometimes actively making contact.
Can Remote Viewing Really Enable Communication with Extraterrestrial Civilizations?
This is the question everyone asks when they first encounter this subject. The answer, based on many years of observation, is: yes – but it requires something far beyond mere willingness.
Observation is only the first stage.
My long-term research indicates that many extraterrestrial civilizations are aware they are being observed. More than that – some actively respond. Not by radio, not through technological signatures detectable by SETI, but at the level of consciousness.
This means extrasensory perception is not merely a tool for one-sided surveillance. It is a potential channel for two-way communication.
What Makes Such Contact Possible?
Three pillars, without which meaningful contact is not possible:
- Trained perception – the ability to distinguish authentic signal from one’s own mind’s projections.
- Observer neutrality – the absence of pre-established narratives, expectations, or emotional investment in the outcome.
- Mature consciousness and ethical readiness – understood not as moralizing, but as the capacity for responsible presence in contact.
What Distinguishes the Civilizational Dimension of Remote Viewing
The standard approach to UAP assumes we are dealing with a physical problem – an object in airspace. Yet a growing body of data – both from U.S. Congressional hearings (2023, 2024, 2025) and from Remote Viewing practice – points to something fundamentally different.
Non-human intelligence does not behave like a physical object in the Newtonian sense. It manifests properties that Remote Viewing registers far more precisely than any technical sensor:
- Intentionality – UAP objects are guided by consciousness, not engines.
- Responsiveness – they react to the observer’s attention.
- Multi-dimensionality – they appear and disappear in ways that suggest operation in dimensions beyond the three spatial ones.
From my perspective after more than two decades of research: Remote Viewing is not an alternative to scientific UAP investigation. It is its complement – adding a dimension that instrumental science does not yet have the means to measure.
Cosmic Diplomats and Ambassadors – and Whether You Can Become One
Imagine an advanced civilization that wants to establish dialogue with humanity. Who will it approach?
The question is rhetorical – but worth serious reflection.
Not politicians, whose position comes from ambition and power games. Not media, which process everything through the filter of sensation. Most often: individuals who have developed perception, the capacity for neutral observation, and the ethical maturity needed to make contact valuable for both sides.
Some researchers and practitioners call such people cosmic diplomats or ambassadors – not in any official title sense, but in terms of the function they actually serve.
What Is Required for This Kind of Contact?
- Developed and trained extrasensory perception.
- The capacity to be a neutral observer with no ego invested in the outcome.
- Knowledge of the nature of consciousness and the mechanisms of perception.
- Maturity to distinguish valuable contact from manipulation.
- Humility in the face of what we do not yet know.
Naivety always attracts those who will exploit it – whether we are dealing with humans or other forms of intelligence. That is why well-developed self-awareness and appropriate training under an experienced guide are not optional. They are an absolute necessity.
Why Target Selection Matters Especially in This Field
Not every target is equally safe for a beginning viewer.
Remote Viewing is not purely a passive tool. With proper contact established, it becomes a space of meeting. And meetings – like all meetings – have their character, their energy, and their consequences.
From experience: what we make contact with through extrasensory perception becomes part of our inner experience. A wise approach means:
- Focusing on targets whose exploration is beneficial or at least neutral.
- Avoiding – especially in the early stages of training – venturing into dark, destructive regions of reality.
- Working with an experienced guide who knows the methodology and can calibrate target selection to the group’s current stage.
We live in a living, connected universe. Conscious journeying into its depths is both a privilege and a responsibility.
Sources
- AARO (All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office) – the official U.S. Department of Defense site collecting UAP reports: aaro.mil
- Congress.gov – UAP Hearings – full transcripts of testimony from veterans and intelligence officers before the U.S. Congress (2023-2025): congress.gov
- Farsight Institute – Remote Viewing research center focused on extraterrestrial civilizations: farsight.org
- The Monroe Institute – research on expanded states of consciousness and extrasensory perception: monroeinstitute.org
- Journal of Scientific Exploration – peer-reviewed scientific publications in parapsychology and anomalous phenomena: scientificexploration.org
FAQ
Can Remote Viewing enable two-way contact with extraterrestrial intelligence? Yes – Remote Viewing allows for two-way interaction with non-human forms of intelligence. Observation is the first stage; trained viewers operating under proper protocol can move beyond passive perception into active exchange.
Has Remote Viewing been scientifically verified? Yes – through U.S. government programs including STARGATE (conducted by SRI International and the CIA from 1970 to 1995). Results demonstrated statistically significant effectiveness above chance levels. Detailed reports are available in CIA archives (CREST database).
How do we know contact with an extraterrestrial civilization through RV is not just the viewer’s imagination? The double-blind protocol plays the key role. The viewer doesn’t know what the target is – and therefore cannot project expectations onto it. When multiple viewers independently describe consistent characteristics of the same unknown target, the probability that this is purely imagination becomes vanishingly small.
Can anyone learn Remote Viewing for the purpose of ET contact? Remote Viewing is a human ability, not a rare gift. It can be developed through training. However, contact with extraterrestrial civilizations is an advanced stage of the practice – requiring a solid foundation of trained neutrality, emotional maturity, and proper guidance. Premature attempts without preparation can lead to confusion and false interpretations.
What is the difference between UAP and UFO – and why does the terminology change matter? UFO (Unidentified Flying Object) implied only an object in airspace. UAP (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena) is a broader term officially adopted by the U.S. government in 2021, covering objects operating in water and outer space as well as phenomena whose behavior cannot be explained by any known technology. The shift is not cosmetic – it opens the door to more serious engagement with the subject by scientific and military institutions.
Jakub Qba Niegowski – Extrasensory Awareness Development Specialist
Structured practice helps most people progress faster, which is why we run a live online remote viewing course.





